The five stages of team development help a team know where it is and learn how to go through each stage. When people are assigned to a project, they are often called a team. However, even if they have worked on a team before, it is doubtful they are an effective team. On the other hand, if they know the five stages of team development, they can become more effective quicker.
Bruce Wayne Tuckman first theorized the stages of team growth and published them in 1965, calling them “Tuckman’s Stages.” At that time, he only had four stages of team development. Then, in 1977, Tuckman worked with Mary Ann Jensen, and they created the fifth team development stage.
Before you learn about the five stages, consider this question: How can a team know which stage or phase it is in?
Is team growth sequential or Iterative? From my experience, not research, iterative makes the most sense. Of course, completing one stage and moving on to the next would be nice. However, reality shows that teams tend to move to later and revisit earlier stages depending on the situation or team.
It's a common misconception that team development is a straightforward progression from Forming to Performing. This belief can lead to unrealistic expectations, such as expecting a group of people to function as a team from the start. The reality is that team development is a process that takes time and effort, often with setbacks and revisits to earlier stages.
Teams experience each stage but often don’t complete a stage before moving to the next one. Then, they go back to earlier stages to support growth needs in the later stages. Of course, individual personalities create the iterative nature of team growth. If they can deal with the PROBLEM, then teams get more effective.
Considering those thoughts, the left side of the graphic below shows how I see team development as it progresses through the five stages.
The first stage is Forming, which is relatively easy yet critical and often ignored. This stage helps members get to know each other and establishes the team guidelines and processes.
Next comes Storming, which is often the cause of failure. This is where the members transition from expectations to actual work.
Norming only shows up with agreement and trust as a team is in the Storming stage. The Storming subsides as the team develops a consensus on how to do the work.
Then, Performing occurs as stages 1-3 take less energy and time. As roles and responsibilities work out, more gets done. But don't forget that those earlier stages will most often be revisited. So, in this Performing stage, the team settles on its relationships and ways to get work done.
Finally, the Adjourning stage is often ignored. When used, it benefits future teams and their work. In this stage, you share what you learned about the project, technology, processes, and relationships among the members. This often passes extremely valuable insights along.
You initiate this stage when the team first meets each other. In this first meeting, team members are introduced to each other. You encourage them to share information about their backgrounds, interests, and experiences and form first impressions of each other. They also learn about the project they will be working on, discuss its objectives/goals, and think about what role they will play on the project team. They are not yet working on the project. Basically, they are gathering information about each other and finding how they might work together at this stage.
Additionally, during this first stage, the team leader needs to be very clear about team goals and provide clear direction regarding the project. It is best to involve the members as roles and responsibilities are discussed and determined.
Team development isn't just about roles and responsibilities. It is also about guidelines and rules for how they will work together. These guidelines provide a clear structure for communication, procedures, and interpersonal relations.
The team primarily depends on the leader to guide them during this stage.
As the team begins to work together, it moves into the “storming” stage. This stage is not avoidable; every team – especially a new team that has never worked together before – goes through this part of team development.
Here, members compete for status and acceptance of their ideas. They have different opinions on what to do and how to do it, which creates conflict within the team. As they progress with the guidance of the team leader, they learn how to solve problems together and function independently and together. And they begin to adapt to their roles and responsibilities on the team.
Since most people prefer to avoid conflict, this is a difficult stage for teams.
Storming requires an adept team leader who facilitates rather than directs the team. The leader ensures that team members learn to listen to each other and respect different ideas and approaches. It also requires working with team members who try to control all conversations and facilitating contributions from quieter team members.
The team leader coaches some people to be more assertive and others to be more relational.
This stage seldom closes completely but is complete primarily when team members accept each other more and learn how to work together for the project's good. The team leader starts transitioning some decision-making to the team to encourage self-governance and independence. Additional team development is needed to resolve conflicts quickly so leaders stay involved.
Some teams, however, do not move beyond this stage, and the entire project is spent in conflict with low morale and motivation. Those projects are challenging to complete.
Most teams have more professionally immature members, so the team may only move past this stage with solid leadership.
When the team moves into "Norming," they begin to work more effectively. The structures and methods help them work together and focus less on themselves. They show more respect for each other’s opinions and value differences. Finally, they begin to see the value in the differences, which makes working together seem more natural.
So, right now, you might be able to guess which team development stage your team is in. It is not easy, though, because moving through the stages is not likely to be a straight line.
As the team agrees on team rules for working together, how they will share information and resolve team conflict, and what tools and processes they will use, less friction occurs, and more gets done. The team members begin to trust each other and actively seek each other out for assistance and input.
Rather than compete against each other, they now help each other work toward a common goal. Team members also start to make significant progress on the project.
The team leader may be less involved in decision-making and problem-solving since the team members work better together. The leader encourages them to take on more responsibility in these areas. Additionally, the team has greater self-direction and can resolve issues and conflicts alone. However, the team leader may step in to move things along if the team gets stuck. The team leader should always ensure that the team members are working collaboratively and may begin to function as a coach to the team members.
When teams arrive at this stage, they function at a high level. They focus on the team's goal and know, trust, and rely on each other.
Not every team makes it to this level of team development; some teams stop at Norming. The high-performing team functions with little oversight, and members are more interdependent.
At this stage, the team wants to get the job done. They make decisions and problem-solve effectively. When they disagree, members work through it and resolve issues without interrupting the project’s progress. If team processes need to be changed, the team is mature enough to agree on how the process needs to change without reliance on the team leader.
The team leader encourages team decision-making, problem-solving, or other such activities without the leader's involvement. The team works effectively and does not need the oversight required at the other stages. The leader monitors the team's development and celebrates milestone achievements with the team. That continues to build team camaraderie. The team's high performance allows the leader to interact and serve as the gateway when decisions need to be reached at a higher level within the organization.
Even in this stage, the team may revert to another stage. For example, they may revert to the “storming” stage if one of the members starts working independently. Or, the team may revert to the “forming” stage if a new member joins the team. And, if there are significant changes, the team may go back until they manage through the transition.
Finally, the project ends, and members move into different roles and responsibilities. This stage looks at the team from the perspective of the team's well-being rather than from managing a team through the initial four stages of team development.
Here the team leader ensures there is time for the team to celebrate the project's success and capture best practices for future use. (Or, if it was not a successful project – evaluate what happened and capture lessons learned for future projects.)
This also allows the team to say goodbye and wish each other luck in pursuing their next endeavor. When the group reaches Stage 4 - Performing, it is likely that they will keep in touch with each other. High-performing teams develop bonds and become very close-knit groups. It is even sad for them to separate and move on to other projects.
That is just the nature of working together, especially in successful projects.
So, if you are on a team right now, guess where your team is currently. It may not be easy, but it might be very instructive to help your project complete successfully.
Tags
forming, high performance, high performing teams, norming, performing, self-governance, storming, Team growth
If you desire to lead, you must have six critical leadership values. You can only be a great leader if you have great values. Unfortunately, great values are highly underrated. But those values make the difference between being a GOOD or BAD leader. As a leader, when you subject your leadership to the six critical leader
Read MoreAre you focused on job satisfaction or typical human resource items? If you want employee satisfaction, focus on 6 work-enriching principles. Why is so much time spent on things that will not increase job satisfaction? Because it takes time and energy to focus on items that really do impact job satisfaction. The 6 work enriching principles
Read More